A Practical Guide for Building Marketing Measurement in Clean Rooms

Data Governance

Date : 05/09/2025

Data Governance

Date : 05/09/2025

A Practical Guide for Building Marketing Measurement in Clean Rooms

Navigate the world of data clean rooms for marketing measurement. Learn how they go beyond standard reporting, compare Meta AA and Google ADH, and understand the realities of implementation for privacy-safe insights.

Charvi Nagpal

AUTHOR - FOLLOW
Charvi Nagpal
Manager, CXM

A Practical Guide for Building Marketing Measurement in Clean Rooms
Like the blog

Table of contents

A Practical Guide for Building Marketing Measurement in Clean Rooms

  • Beyond Just Standard Reporting
  • Crafting Clean Room Measurement: Meta AA vs. Google ADH in Action
  • The Realities of Clean Room Implementation: What to Expect

Table of contents

A Practical Guide for Building Marketing Measurement in Clean Rooms

  • Beyond Just Standard Reporting
  • Crafting Clean Room Measurement: Meta AA vs. Google ADH in Action
  • The Realities of Clean Room Implementation: What to Expect
A Practical Guide for Building Marketing Measurement in Clean Rooms

If you've worked in marketing, you've undoubtedly heard about data clean rooms-touted as the next big thing for personalized targeting, campaign efficiency, and marketing measurement. With the deprecation of third-party cookies, these secure environments offer a privacy-safe way to personalize campaigns, boost efficiency, and accurately measure marketing impact.

In this article, we move beyond the basic "what" of clean rooms to explore the practical applications for marketers: how clean rooms go beyond standard reporting, how to build effective marketing solutions within them, and where expectations meet reality when it comes to their limitations towards unified marketing measurement.

Beyond Just Standard Reporting

With the decline of third-party cookies, marketers have had to rethink how they measure campaign performance. Traditional methods-like first-party attribution and publisher-based attribution-offer some visibility, but each comes with its limitations. Clean rooms have emerged as a step forward, providing more control, granularity, and privacy-compliant measurement. But how exactly do they compare to existing methods?

The table below outlines how attribution has evolved, highlighting the benefits and trade-offs at each stage:

Evolution of Attribution: From First-Party Data to Clean Rooms

To understand this shift, let's first define the key attribution methods and then explore their pros and cons to see how measurement has evolved:

  • First-Party Attribution: Advertisers collect first-party cookies directly from their websites, tracking where customers came from before landing on their site. By combining this data with their first-party advertising data, they can reconstruct the customer journey and measure campaign impact.
  • Publisher-Based Attribution: Advertisers share their first-party transaction data with publishers through data-sharing mechanisms like Conversions API. The publisher then applies its own attribution models to calculate revenue and Return on Ad Spend (ROAS), providing advertisers with insights but limiting transparency and customization.
  • Clean Room-Based Measurement: Both publishers and advertisers contribute data to a privacy-controlled environment, allowing advertisers to build their own attribution models while maintaining compliance. This approach grants more flexibility and control over measurement but comes with its own set of complexities.

Approach

Pros

Cons

First-Party Attribution (Without Third-Party Cookies)

 Tracks visitors from ads to transactions using first-party data.

 

Works well for lower-funnel conversions.

No attribution for upper-funnel metrics.

 

Misses non-digital conversions.

   

No visibility into impressions or non-clickable display/video impact.

   

Attribution limited to clicks.

   

Limited to individual websites—no cross-channel tracking.

   

No insights at product or customer level.

   

Publisher-Based Attribution

Publishers incorporate impression data, enabling upper-funnel attribution.

 

Can account for non-digital conversions.

   

Models can use impressions, not just clicks.

   

Some product-level impact assessment.

Attribution models vary across publishers—no uniformity.

 

Probabilistic customer matching instead of deterministic.

   

Data silos persist across platforms.

   

Limited product-level and customer-segment insights.

   

Privacy concerns over data sharing.

   

Clean Room-Based Attribution

Full control over attribution models for uniformity.

 

Deterministic customer matching for higher accuracy.

   

Granular insights at product and customer level.

   

Strongest privacy controls.

Data silos persist—walled gardens (Google, Facebook, AMC) restrict data sharing.

 

Limited ability to extract and merge cross-platform insights due to privacy rules.

   

Implementation is complex due to privacy restrictions.

   

Clean rooms provide the most advanced measurement capabilities while ensuring privacy compliance. However, they aren't a silver bullet-data remains siloed across platforms, limiting a unified view of marketing performance. While they offer better control over attribution modeling and customer matching, privacy constraints make implementation complex.

Next, we'll break down the strategies for creating a powerful clean room measurement solution by comparing the implementation approaches of two giants in the space-Meta AA and Google's ADH. Let's dive in and see how these walled gardens stack up!

Crafting Clean Room Measurement: Meta AA vs. Google ADH in Action

Attribution modeling in clean rooms in theory seems straightforward-publishers provide customer-level impression data, advertisers upload transaction data, and a clean room-specific customer matching process is applied. From there, attribution models are built using SQL-based query languages, and once processed, data is extracted at an aggregated level for analysis. However, while the process may appear simple, there are complexities involved in building and managing clean rooms effectively.

To better understand this process, let's break it down step by step by comparing two of the largest walled garden clean rooms: Meta Advanced Analytics (AA) and Google Ads Data Hub (ADH) [Meta AA is often referred to as a clean room, but its capabilities are quite limited in practice.

Stage

Meta Advanced Analytics (AA)

Google Ads Data Hub (ADH)

Access & Setup

Requires access via Meta Business Manager. Developer docs available.

Requires a Google account with permissions. Google Ads, DV360, and YouTube accounts must be linked.

Data Preparation & Upload

Upload Customer Transaction Data via API (automated) or manual upload. Data hygiene is critical.

Upload first-party data (CRM, interactions) to Google BigQuery before integration.

Data Matching & Privacy

Uses hashed PII (email, phone, address) to generate People ID for attribution.

Matches first-party data with Google’s ad event data using hashed identifiers.

Attribution Modeling & Querying

Queries written in SQL, joining impression & click data with transactions using People ID.

Queries written in SQL, combining advertiser data with Google’s ad event data. A sandbox environment allows testing.

Data Extraction & Reporting

Aggregated results extracted via UI (JSON download) or APIs for automation.

Aggregated results exported to BigQuery

Key Limitations

- Blanket min. 50 users per dataset limit for extraction.

 
  • Manual query approvals slow down analysis.
  • No access to raw records for debugging.
  • No cross-platform interoperability (walled gardens). | - Data extraction limits are dependent on tables (10 for clicks/conversion, 50 for impressions - estimated)
  • Privacy restrictions prevent user re-identification.
  • No real-time data access (potential delays).
  • Limited cross-channel visibility. | | Best Practices | - Validate data early with simple queries. - Use macros for efficiency.
  • Plan for delays due to manual approvals. | - Validate data with test queries in the sandbox.
  • Account for data latency in reporting timelines.
  • Leverage Looker Studio for visualization. |

Clean rooms like Meta AA and Google ADH offer advanced attribution capabilities while ensuring data privacy. However, challenges such as cross-platform data fragmentation, privacy restrictions, and delayed query processing remain. Marketers must navigate these constraints carefully to build scalable, privacy-compliant attribution models.

The Realities of Clean Room Implementation: What to Expect

Clean rooms offer a powerful framework for unifying marketing measurement, but marketers need to be aware of the challenges and limitations that come with their implementation. While they enable data collaboration without sacrificing privacy, clean rooms often work with aggregated data, which may limit the granularity of insights typically available through first-party data. This trade-off can impact the depth of analysis, especially when marketers are accustomed to more detailed customer-level data.

Another challenge lies in integrating data from various sources. While clean rooms promise a unified approach, aligning data across different platforms often introduces complexity, leading to potential discrepancies and difficulties in achieving a holistic view of the customer journey. In practice, achieving this view is particularly difficult-while walled gardens like Meta and Google restrict sharing data outside their ecosystems, the data from other platforms is more of a potential, often discussed in theory, rather than a fully realized reality.

In conclusion, while clean rooms offer a valuable framework for collaborative data analysis, marketers should approach them with a clear understanding of their limitations and manage expectations accordingly. Clean rooms are not a one-size-fits-all solution but rather an important piece of a larger, integrated marketing measurement ecosystem.

Charvi Nagpal

AUTHOR - FOLLOW
Charvi Nagpal
Manager, CXM


Next Topic

Mastering Databricks Apps: From Creation to Deployment of Interactive Data Applications



Next Topic

Mastering Databricks Apps: From Creation to Deployment of Interactive Data Applications


Ready to talk?

Join forces with our data science and AI leaders to navigate your toughest challenges.

×
Thank you for a like!

Stay informed and up-to-date with the most recent trends in data science and AI.

Share this article
×

Ready to talk?

Join forces with our data science and AI leaders to navigate your toughest challenges.